That old adage hasn't been so moving in a year which has seen a surge in fake news. The rise in narratives describing events that never happened, commonly involving imitation men and women in places that were fake, has led Facebook and Google promising to undertake them. However, are we really so gullible?
According to a number of studies, the answer is yes if it’s shared enough times, the most apparent fake news begins to become believable.
There was a surge in fake news, in the months running around the US election. Based on an evaluation by Craig Silverman, a journalist, during this time the top 20 fake reports in circulation overtook the top 20 stories from 19 mainstream publishers.
Paul Horner, a prolific publisher of news that was fake, has said he believes Donald Trump was elected because of him. “My websites were picked up by Trump supporters each of the time… His followers don’t fact-check anything – they’ll post everything, believe anything,” he told the Washington Post.
Silverman found that shares and social interactions around fake news posts dwarfed those of the articles that debunked them and previously tracked rumours circulating online in 2014. Based on Silverman, fake news stories are engineered to appeal to folks’s hopes and anxieties, and aren’t constrained by reality, which gives them the edge in creating content that is shareable.
I know it’s wrong
A wealth of research disagrees, although you might think you’re protected to falling for these lies. In the 1940s, researchers discovered that “the more a rumour is told, the greater is its plausibility”. They proposed this ensures that a rumour born out of suspicion that was moderate can, by gaining currency, change view and public thinking.
This impression of truth was demonstrated in 1977 when research workers in the US quizzed college students on the veracity of statements that they were told may be true or fictitious. The researchers found that merely repeating the statements at a subsequent date was enough to improve the likelihood of the pupils believing them.
Last year, Lisa Fazio at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee and her team discovered that pupils become more likely to believe a statement they know should not be true if it's repeated.
Our research implies that fictitious news can and probably does impact people ’s beliefs. Reading it multiple times can allow it to be seem more authentic even if people have the information to understand a headline is bogus,” Fazio says.
Reassuringly, the team discovered that the person’s prior knowledge still has a sizable influence on their beliefs, but it a worrying trend given that falsehoods appear repeatedly in our newsfeeds every day.
Work out it
Can we learn to find fake news? There is little evidence that young individuals have grown skillful at discovering it, despite growing up surrounded by fake news. In a recent study, US high school students were shown an image of deformed blooms purportedly growing near the ill-fated Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan.
You'll find other problems – comprising whether they possess the necessary expertise if we’re expecting such companies to function as the arbiters of truth. A recent investigation reported that outsourced workers used by Facebook to filter content flagged as violent make their evaluations on average in just 10 seconds.
Just how is it possible to shield yourself from lies that are digital? A simple step would be to check who produced it. Often it's clear from your URL a website is pretending to be by stealing the name and style of some other publication reputable. Additionally, take a look at the other stories on the website. Fake news websites frequently have nothing but content that is fake. Consider it a red flag if all the reports are hideous. Finally, search for coverage of the report elsewhere, if a report is fictitious you’ll generally locate it debunked on websites including snopes.com.